[Oni]

Death row inmates were given the choice between the electric chair or a firing squad. They're suing the state instead, on the basis that lethal injection has been the de facto method of execution since the 1990s.

Two death row inmates in South Carolina, now required by law to choose between a yet-to-be-formed firing squad and a 109-year-old electric chair, have decided to sue instead. They call the state's recently signed legislation unconstitutional because lethal injection was the main method of execution when they were sentenced.

It's an argument Democratic state Rep. Justin Bamberg vehemently made as he fought against the new law that is intended to restart executions that have involuntarily stalled in the state for a decade.

"We're going to force people to get electrocuted and give them the choice of getting shot instead when that wasn't even the law when they were convicted of their crime," says Bamberg.

The law does say lethal injection is still possible if it's available. But that's a big if.

Many pharmaceutical companies have stopped selling the chemicals needed to put inmates to death with a needle and in South Carolina, unlike other states, there is no shield law to protect local drug makers' identities.

Read More: https://www.npr.org/2021/05/20/998600135...challenges

[mothered]

They're suing the state instead, on the basis that lethal injection has been the de facto method of execution since the 1990s.

I must say I agree with this.

The (lack of) availability of lethal Injection, should not be Imposed on the Inmates. In my view, I believe they're well within their rights to face a capital punishment that has been In effect for decades.