Login Register
Poll: Bring back MotM?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
93.75%
15 93.75%
No
6.25%
1 6.25%
Total 16 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]



Bring back MotM (again) filter_list
Author
Message
RE: Bring back MotM (again) #21
(05-04-2017, 01:37 PM)LordBos_X Wrote: This sounds like a good idea. Who decides the winner if more than one person is nominated?

Usually (like other trends with MotM) there is a voting poll with the nominees. Most member voted on wins the award.
(This post was last modified: 05-04-2017, 01:43 PM by Double06. Edit Reason: typo )


RE: Bring back MotM (again) #22
An argument against it is that it just becomes a popularity contest / being a nice person makes you a great member, and that's not what it's really about.

I'm personally for it. It gives users a reason to be HQ.
Who Knows?


RE: Bring back MotM (again) #23
(05-04-2017, 02:16 PM)Zenith Wrote: An argument against it is that it just becomes a popularity contest / being a nice person makes you a great member, and that's not what it's really about.

I'm personally for it. It gives users a reason to be HQ.
What about members like me who are HQ without any reason?


RE: Bring back MotM (again) #24
It's got my vote! Lets see where this goes this time
[Image: pBD38Xq.png]
Email: insidious@protonmail.ch


RE: Bring back MotM (again) #25
(05-08-2017, 04:53 PM)insidious Wrote: It's got my vote! Lets see where this goes this time
Probably nowhere because managing motm seems like it would take too much commitment for this community and no, I'm not kidding.


RE: Bring back MotM (again) #26
(05-08-2017, 04:54 PM)pvnk Wrote:
(05-08-2017, 04:53 PM)insidious Wrote: It's got my vote! Lets see where this goes this time
Probably nowhere because managing motm seems like it would take too much commitment for this community and no, I'm not kidding.

Wouldn't say it takes so much commitment to host the contest, it's really member-driven.


RE: Bring back MotM (again) #27
If we did MotM we would have to set some rules. I personally would disqualify members with bans in the past 3 months.
[Image: qcYJ3l.png]


RE: Bring back MotM (again) #28
(05-08-2017, 04:18 PM)pvnk Wrote:
(05-04-2017, 02:16 PM)Zenith Wrote: An argument against it is that it just becomes a popularity contest / being a nice person makes you a great member, and that's not what it's really about.

I'm personally for it. It gives users a reason to be HQ.
What about members like me who are HQ without any reason?

It's an extra award for being HQ lul
Who Knows?


RE: Bring back MotM (again) #29
(05-08-2017, 06:24 PM)Zenith Wrote:
(05-08-2017, 04:18 PM)pvnk Wrote:
(05-04-2017, 02:16 PM)Zenith Wrote: An argument against it is that it just becomes a popularity contest / being a nice person makes you a great member, and that's not what it's really about.

I'm personally for it. It gives users a reason to be HQ.
What about members like me who are HQ without any reason?

It's an extra award for being HQ lul
Awww you guys are too kind.


RE: Bring back MotM (again) #30
(05-08-2017, 05:39 PM)Skullmeat Wrote: If we did MotM we would have to set some rules. I personally would disqualify members with bans in the past 3 months.

I agree with the above post.

Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
@pvnk might end up getting it if not for this
(This post was last modified: 05-08-2017, 08:32 PM by Blink.)


(11-02-2018, 02:51 AM)Skullmeat Wrote: Ok, there no real practical reason for doing this, but that's never stopped me.








Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)