Login Register






Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average


Apple Products Used As War Weapons filter_list
Author
Message
RE: Apple Products Used As War Weapons #11
Most major navies have had this capability for ages, why is this newsworthy? It's old technology on new devices.

Reply

RE: Apple Products Used As War Weapons #12
(01-14-2013, 01:56 AM)w00t Wrote: Most major navies have had this capability for ages, why is this newsworthy? It's old technology on new devices.

Because it's user friendly? A 5 year old could snipe a person 1km away.
[Image: 7uhCgFS.jpg?1]

Reply

RE: Apple Products Used As War Weapons #13
UAVs have used the same tech for over 5 years.

Reply

RE: Apple Products Used As War Weapons #14
(01-14-2013, 05:19 AM)w00t Wrote: UAVs have used the same tech for over 5 years.

At the touch of screen? Or one which still requires manual calculations and computer input?
I checked. The latter.
[Image: 7uhCgFS.jpg?1]

Reply

RE: Apple Products Used As War Weapons #15
Drone stations have been fairly point and click for some time. You have one person flying it, one person point and shoot with the ordinance.

Reply

RE: Apple Products Used As War Weapons #16
(01-14-2013, 06:27 AM)w00t Wrote: Drone stations have been fairly point and click for some time. You have one person flying it, one person point and shoot with the ordinance.

Do you have any resources to back this up?
[Image: 7uhCgFS.jpg?1]

Reply

RE: Apple Products Used As War Weapons #17
Well, this is out of the Extraordinary, and extremely interesting. So, what kind of "Weapon" is this?

Reply

RE: Apple Products Used As War Weapons #18
(01-14-2013, 07:19 AM)DrBlowFish Wrote: Well, this is out of the Extraordinary, and extremely interesting. So, what kind of "Weapon" is this?

It's all listed in the source.
[Image: 7uhCgFS.jpg?1]

Reply

RE: Apple Products Used As War Weapons #19
(01-14-2013, 07:46 AM)Phytrix Wrote:
(01-14-2013, 07:19 AM)DrBlowFish Wrote: Well, this is out of the Extraordinary, and extremely interesting. So, what kind of "Weapon" is this?

It's all listed in the source.

Alright, sorry for not reading the source at first. I just didn't look at it in-depth. Once again, very interesting. Thank you for sharing Phytrix!

Reply







Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)