Against.py Best SSH Bruteforcer 03-03-2014, 02:02 AM
#1
http://www.nullsecurity.net/tools/cracker/against.py
Already rooted a few boxes with this.
Already rooted a few boxes with this.
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
| Against.py Best SSH Bruteforcer filter_list | |
![[+]](https://sinister.ly/images/modern/collapse_collapsed.png)
RE: Against.py Best SSH Bruteforcer 03-03-2014, 06:05 AM
#2
tbh, install a PAM logger backdoor on your own system and log failed SSH attempts, then try to SSH into the attackers' boxes with the same password. Quite a few lame worms are going around that try to guess bad SSH passes.
PGP
Sign: F202 79C9 76F7 40BB 54EC 494F 5DEF 1D70 14C1 C4CC
Encrypt: A5B3 1B21 55E1 80AF 4C6E DE83 467B 8EFC 3DEE 681C
Auth: CD55 E8A5 1A08 2933 8BA6 BC88 D81F 1943 739A 3C47
Sign: F202 79C9 76F7 40BB 54EC 494F 5DEF 1D70 14C1 C4CC
Encrypt: A5B3 1B21 55E1 80AF 4C6E DE83 467B 8EFC 3DEE 681C
Auth: CD55 E8A5 1A08 2933 8BA6 BC88 D81F 1943 739A 3C47
RE: Against.py Best SSH Bruteforcer 03-03-2014, 05:08 PM
#3
I would like to say that this script is a bad idea in almost every sense. Wherever there should have been multi-processing, there is multi-threading, not that either can bypass the global thread lock anyway. Additionally, using an interpreted language for brute forcing is like using a recursive method when an iterative one will do. That is to say, it's largely more expensive and slower. As if that wasn't enough, the script is terrible optimized and is not multi-platform.
Why yes, I am mad, why do you ask?
Why yes, I am mad, why do you ask?
![[Image: jWSyE88.png]](http://i.imgur.com/jWSyE88.png)
RE: Against.py Best SSH Bruteforcer 03-03-2014, 06:06 PM
#4
You really should look up the difference between the python modules for threading and multiprocessing, the latter does indeed bypass the GIL.
As for your worries about using an IL, the bottleneck for any networked bruteforce will always be network bandwidth, not processing speed of the sender. The only valid concern would be the increased memory footprint on the client.
As for your worries about using an IL, the bottleneck for any networked bruteforce will always be network bandwidth, not processing speed of the sender. The only valid concern would be the increased memory footprint on the client.
RE: Against.py Best SSH Bruteforcer 03-05-2014, 08:13 AM
#5
(03-05-2014, 05:20 AM)misnar Wrote: i love you too you FUCKING BLACK NIGGER APE
But i may just be the whitest kid you know
you cute little orangutan you!![[Image: 400_F_46151614_Csbvnz2QELwqrObUrmobdaFh0JrX3hI5.jpg]](http://t1.ftcdn.net/jpg/00/46/15/16/400_F_46151614_Csbvnz2QELwqrObUrmobdaFh0JrX3hI5.jpg)
![[Image: 3ztiqq-2.png]](https://valid.x86.fr/cache/banner/3ztiqq-2.png)
RE: Against.py Best SSH Bruteforcer 03-05-2014, 08:27 AM
#6
It's made for a different version of Python, this is a bitch to me since I have to take time to convert it to my version's syntax.
Ex:
print 'fuck you'
and
print('fuck you')
Also, I'm with 3ss. This isn't the best.
Ex:
print 'fuck you'
and
print('fuck you')
Also, I'm with 3ss. This isn't the best.
![[Image: BXqGARG.png]](https://i.imgur.com/BXqGARG.png)
RE: Against.py Best SSH Bruteforcer 03-05-2014, 04:41 PM
#7
(03-05-2014, 08:27 AM)Duubz Wrote: It's made for a different version of Python, this is a bitch to me since I have to take time to convert it to my version's syntax.
Ex:
print 'fuck you'
and
print('fuck you')
Also, I'm with 3ss. This isn't the best.
What system are you running that you don't have both python2.7.x and python3
RE: Against.py Best SSH Bruteforcer 03-05-2014, 06:08 PM
#8
(03-05-2014, 04:41 PM)w00t Wrote: What system are you running that you don't have both python2.7.x and python3
I only run Py33. Windows 8. Not that I can't run both but I don't.
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)