[Bish0pQ]

No using a gtx 460, slightly older gpu.

I don't know, i agree that it isn't exactly secure but if you use the system especially for gaming it might be worth it. Certainly for lower budget builds. And I know

[ImmNinjaxD]

No using a gtx 460, slightly older gpu.

I don't know, i agree that it isn't exactly secure but if you use the system especially for gaming it might be worth it. Certainly for lower budget builds. And I know

It sounds like they just lightened / optimized the OS load then, sounds logical for an advanced version to me

& Yeah that's true, a little bit of speed does make a difference when you're playing, which is why I sunk ~$1k into my current build so I didn't have to lower my settings when trying to record stuff.

And I know

Just making sure! Have gotten into a few debates on past forums because of a misjudged tone lol

[The Real Slim Shady]

Imagine if Microsoft released new Windows XP 2016 which is as stable as it was back in a day but with modern software as it is these days and the latest trend design.

heh you're fucking hilarious.

What do think all these upgrades are? What is Windows 7 if not more modern software and the latest trend in design?

Sure they fuckup more often than they get it right. But what you're suggesting they do is exactly what they are attempting to do. lol

---

Huh, that's pretty interesting (my knowledge of OS's before XP is null - pretty sure the first one I remember in our house was either XP or 2000, and I was just a toddler at the time).

2000 wasn't really a home/desktop operating system. It was more targeted to business and server use. It didn't look pretty like Windows ME or XP. It looked more like Windows 98. You more likely started off with Windows ME or XP.

[ImmNinjaxD]

2000 wasn't really a home/desktop operating system. It was more targeted to business and server use. It didn't look pretty like Windows ME or XP. It looked more like Windows 98. You more likely started off with Windows ME or XP.

Just looked at some screenshots, and ME sounds pretty right. We had 2-3 computers back during the time where large and beige was the style.

What do think all these upgrades are? What is Windows 7 if not more modern software and the latest trend in design?

Sure they fuckup more often than they get it right. But what you're suggesting they do is exactly what they are attempting to do. lol

Yeah, you're right. Windows 8 attempted to appeal to those who prefer tablets (although failed imo) and Windows 10 sounds like it has tiny perks here and there (although buggy and invasive). People tend to judge things with half truth and half feeling (myself included, of course)

[mothered]

I have a home network, hence use Windows 8, 8.1 and Windows 10.

For compatibility reasons with my computational tasks, I've always been on the Windows platform- even back In the 90s when "Windows 3.1" was around.

[Loki123]

I haven't used anything else than FreeBSD over the past 2 years. I can't see myself going back to any GNU/Linux distribution, I quite regret not trying FreeBSD sooner to be honest. The package management is brilliant. Easy access to the source of applications and a very good warning message about vulnerable applications, in fact, the ports refuse to install packages marked vulnerable without you explicitly telling it to not check for vulnerabilities.

But yeah, FreeBSD 10. Seeing as there is no option for it...

[zorrophreak]

Use Debian, also, I figured W7 and Linux would be the highest simply from the monitoring and usability factors.